Leopold Katz

This is a brief analysis of a 1981 Courier-Post article highlighting some of the major inconsistencies between what attorney Edward Kent stated during his testimony, and what actually took place during Michelle’s adoption process. This post briefly discusses these troubling issues, which are obvious inRead This Article

We are searching for other families impacted by the unethical adoptions organized by Willingboro, New Jersey attorney, EDWARD KENT. This includes adopted individuals, biological families, and adoptive families. Even if you met with Kent about the possibility of an adoption, but never completed the process,Read This Article

173 N.J. Super. 215 (1980) STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD KENT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 10, 1980. Decided July 1, 1980. [1] *218 Before Judges SEIDMAN, MICHELS and DEVINE. William C. Levine, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the causeRead This Article

Original publication: Courier-Post Original publication date: January 22, 1963 “His conduct is dishonorable and brings the profession into disrepute.” -a New Jersey Supreme Court Justice referring to Edward Kent TRENTON (UPI) – The State Supreme Court Monday reprimanded lawyer Edward Kent of Levittown* for bypassingRead This Article